lblanchard: (Default)
[personal profile] lblanchard
This is politics. But I would ask folks on my f-list whose political views tend not to synch with mine to read this and contemplate how you might like such an initiative if, say, it were employed in support of repealing Rove v. Wade, or protecting the Defense of Marriage Act, or any of the other things you (quite rightly) loathe about the unhinged right. Or even if it were employed in support of deregulating one or more of our industries.

Because if the Obama administration creates this, and if the Obama administration is voted out, a really dangerous precedent has been set:

http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/pcourrielche/2009/08/25/the-national-endowment-for-the-art-of-persuasion-patrick-courrielche/#more-209182

Edit: another take from The Volokh Conspiracy:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_08_23-2009_08_29.shtml#1251360555

Date: 2009-08-27 02:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] clindau.livejournal.com
Food for thought. Thanks, Laura.

Date: 2009-08-27 05:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] montieth.livejournal.com
Wow. How long before we get to start carrying large signs with the President's Image on them down the street in parades on May 1st?

Date: 2009-08-28 12:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nsingman.livejournal.com
Why would anyone ever be even slightly surprised that the NEA would be politicized? Who takes the King's shilling, etc.

I prefer Alexandrian solutions to Gordian Knots. So I'll simply note that the National Endowment for the Arts is unconstitutional.

Profile

lblanchard: (Default)
lblanchard

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 16th, 2026 10:06 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios