lblanchard: (Default)
[personal profile] lblanchard
There's some indication that the stoked-up anger at the AIG bonuses may blow back on an administration that ramrodded through the bailout legislation with the AIG bonus loophole in it less than 24 hours after the 1,000-plus page bill was made public.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aXZwBisa10zk&refer=worldwide

There's a factoid rattling around in my head and I must chase up a citation. Said factoid says that some banks were strong-armed into signing on to the bailout even though they didn't need the funds, to keep "weak banks" from being stigmatized. Additionally, the bailout provides horrendous penalties for early paybacks.

Now we are looking at the prospect of all kinds of conditions being imposed, after the fact, on banks that accepted bailout funding, even those that didn't want that particular government cheese in the first place.

Seems to me that at the very least the clown club currently making our laws should afford the healthy banks the opportunity to give back the money and go about their business.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

lblanchard: (Default)
lblanchard

August 2023

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223 242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 01:52 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios